I have to apologies it must be my commenting that you keep missing my point. I was referring to the writting in that blog on Amnesty International website. I do

I have to apologies it must be my commenting that you keep missing my point. I was referring to the writting in that blog on Amnesty International website. I don't what's it to do with Amnesty Inter but my point being it is a stretch to conceptualise '法家' relating the so called 'Rule by law'. Obviously I didn't study law or philosophy but unless you're an expert in the area I doubt that it is an established main stream theory. Just because it's published by Harvard or Cambridge press isn't necessarily a guarantee of high quality research or unbiased reporting. I can easily find this book from Oxford which I consider garbage what typically we find in party education courses. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/law-and-economics-with-chinese-characteristics-9780199698547 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/law-and-economics-wi... >It's a live spreadsheet started in 2013. I mean if you regard it a lawless society in China then it's actually rather impressive, extrapolate by a factor of 1000 (if you want to estimate the 'iceberg') will give you 300,000 cases (assuming all true positives) out 1.4 billion over the course of 10 years. Again please don't twist my meaning.