3 ms·
"Auto-fire is trivial to detect, as is a KBM setup where it doesn't belong" [..] "if they cared to disallow them after only a few minutes of profiling the pla
by jsiepkes 3y ago
"Auto-fire is trivial to detect, as is a KBM setup where it doesn't belong"
[..]
"if they cared to disallow them after only a few minutes of profiling the player."
Definitely not trivial and a gross over simplification. It will create a whole bunch of grey area's and endless tweaking. Which in turn will lead to people getting unfairly banned. Meaning Microsoft will then need to investigate these cases to unban them.
- jasonjayr 3y agoMaybe don't ban them? Maybe mark them and force the player to explain the situation to their peers? Bans revoke products paid for, but marking suspects forces them to explain to their peers the situation and lets them make the decision.
- rvba 3y ago> Maybe mark them and force the player to explain the situation to their peers? I imagined someone trying to explain to a bunch 12 year olds that they dont cheat, while the kids throw random insults. Or some random trolls who mark everything as a hack.
- phone8675309 3y agoThere have been several games that match suspected cheaters with other suspected cheaters, and I've always thought that was a pretty good solution.
- karaterobot 3y agoThat doesn't resolve the false positives, it just takes people who've been marked by an algorithm and puts them somewhere they're guaranteed not to have fun playing the game they bought.