4 ms·
You're extremely correct. Regrettably, I did this intentionally because "Apple CPU Architecture" is more clickable than "Mac CPU Architecture".
by jakey_bakey 3y ago
You're extremely correct.
Regrettably, I did this intentionally because "Apple CPU Architecture" is more clickable than "Mac CPU Architecture".
- gumby 3y agoAlso Apple has used lots of CPU architectures over the years in various devices (e.g. time capsules, various dongles, etc). Surely they must have RISC V deeply embedded in various locations invisible to the end user, both for cost and experience. They could possibly even be used deeply in the bowels of the M and A devices doing some random housekeeping in the storage system or who knows what. In a funny way the term “CPU” is returning to its mainframe roots with so many functional units harnessed into a system, yet at the same time having strayed so far from its original usage (with multicore, non-linear systems) as to have become meaningless.