3 ms·
Where are you getting that impression from the parent post? Maybe they were on a 2, 3, or 4 year upgrade cycle and still had a bunch of Intel MBPs when Apple Si
by JohnBooty 3y ago
Where are you getting that impression from the parent post? Maybe they were on a 2, 3, or 4 year upgrade cycle and still had a bunch of Intel MBPs when Apple Silicon hit the market. That'd be extremely typical.
What dev shop immediately buys all developers the newest and shiniest thing as soon as its released without trialing it first?
- justinclift 3y agoYeah, they were running Intel Macbook Pros because that's what everyone was used to, and also because production ran on x86_64 architecture. At least at the time, things worked a bit easier having the entire pipeline (dev -> prod) use a single architecture.
- JohnBooty 3y agoYeah, that was my experience. The early M1 adopters at my previous company definitely ran into some growing pains with package availability, etc. (Overall the transition was super smooth, but it wasn't instant or without bumps)
- Fomite 3y agoWe stuck with Intel MBPs for awhile because people needed machines, but the scientific computing infrastructure for Apple silicon took more than a little bit to get going.
- whynotminot 3y agoHuh? He was talking about dual monitor situations being a problem. If the company bought Pro or Max chips and not base models, it wouldn’t be a problem.