3 ms·
From your username I thought you might be an expert :). All I have is a small pile of physics classes, so I'm also not an expert. Still, I agree: ridiculous.
by __MatrixMan__ 3y ago
From your username I thought you might be an expert :). All I have is a small pile of physics classes, so I'm also not an expert. Still, I agree: ridiculous.
Just to nit pick your "same speed" comment though...
The tube you linked to indicates 250V at the anode. Electrons have a mass of 10^-13 kg. For such a tiny thing, that voltage is positively tremendous. Even in the tiny space of the tube I think that the electrons are accelerating from 0 when at the cathode to relativistic speeds at the anode. The tube is an accelerator, and the control grid opposes that acceleration.
Accelerating the electrons to even greater energies would just mean that more voltage is needed at the triodes to have any modulating effect on the signal. Also, the beam would be, well, a beam, rather than a... gust? It would either strike the anode or miss it--that's not modulating anything, that's just an on-off switch.