3 ms·
> And the M1 MacBook was quieter, lighter and I could actually sit it on my lap Yeah this is key. In a laptop that’s meant to be used as a laptop, designing fo
by jwells89 3y ago
> And the M1 MacBook was quieter, lighter and I could actually sit it on my lap
Yeah this is key. In a laptop that’s meant to be used as a laptop, designing for maximum power at all costs isn’t the winning move. M1 was nice in that it’s plenty powerful while also not making the laptop’s fans scream and being able to survive away from an outlet for several hours despite doing “real work”.
In short, balance, which is still surprisingly hard to come by in x86 laptops. If you want a 10lb monster desktop replacement, gaming laptop that does the 2016 Apple thing and crams too many watts into too thin of a chassis, or a really weak ultraportable with mediocre battery life you’ve got plenty of options. If you want reasonable performance with great battery life and silence however you’re restricted to a tiny handful of options.
- scarface_74 3y agoOn the other hand, if you want balls to wall performance on a desktop computer, Apple has nothing.
- jwells89 3y agoI feel like most people with those needs aside from a handful of corporate purchasers are going to be building their own towers anyway, which Apple is going to have a hard time competing with even if they fixed the current issues with the Mac Pro towers. It would be interesting if Apple took a crack at an M-series HEDT variant that’s allowed to chug electricity freely though, even if that’d be extremely niche.
- scarface_74 3y agoApple had an answer for that market with the last generation x86 Mac Pro.