3 ms·
I'll check PACER and read the actual ruling when I'm at work tomorrow, but yeah I'm interpreting "dismissed entirely" as "dismissed with prejudice". You're ent
by williamcotton 3y ago
I'll check PACER and read the actual ruling when I'm at work tomorrow, but yeah I'm interpreting "dismissed entirely" as "dismissed with prejudice".
You're entirely correct that if it was dismissed without prejudice the complaints on copyright infringement on the outputs could be amended and refiled.
- starshadowx2 3y agoThis is from the PDF: In opposition, plaintiffs do not address, much less contest, McKernan or Ortiz’s asserted inability to pursue Copyright Act claims. At oral argument, plaintiffs’ counsel clarified that they are not asserting copyright claims on behalf of these two plaintiffs. July 19, 2023 Transcript (Tr.), pg. 17:1-5. As such, McKernan and Ortiz’s copyright act claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.