14 ms·
It’s not grammatical accuracy on their part, it’s the opposite, it’s a calque, a word by word translation from their native tongue. If it was actually perfect
by lynguist 3y ago
It’s not grammatical accuracy on their part, it’s the opposite, it’s a calque, a word by word translation from their native tongue.
If it was actually perfect grammatical accuracy on their part they’d be saying “Who were you talking to” or “Who were you speaking to”.
Correct is what the people say, not the opinion of literal singular English language teachers.
- ninkendo 3y ago> If it was actually perfect grammatical accuracy on their part they’d be saying “Who were you talking to” or “Who were you speaking to”. There is a sizable contingent of English speakers out there that continue to insist that it’s incorrect to end a sentence in a preposition. (I am not part of this group and it is fortunately shrinking over time.)
- skykooler 3y agoHence Churchill's response to said contingent that "This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
- rahimnathwani 3y agoThere's an old joke: Texan: Where are you from? Harvard Student: I'm from a place where we don't end sentences with prepositions. Texan: OK. Where are you from, jackass?
- cabalamat 3y ago> There is a sizable contingent of English speakers out there that continue to insist that it’s incorrect to end a sentence in a preposition That is the sort of nonsense up with which one should not put.
- SamFold 3y ago“With whom were you speaking” IS grammatically correct though. “Whom” is the object of the preposition “with”.
- Tyrannosaur 3y agoEven if you want to differentiate "who" and "whom", "Whom were you speaking with?" is more natural.
- alex-moon 3y agoI use English according to defined grammar rules. It marks me as upper middle class and therefore trustworthy in administrative professional positions, greatly improving my life outcomes compared to someone who is not able to do so.