I wouldn't be averse to that both because it should be standard practice for the most powerful nation in the world to ensure its leader is of sound mind on a le

I wouldn't be averse to that both because it should be standard practice for the most powerful nation in the world to ensure its leader is of sound mind on a legally non-partisan basis and that there should likely be an symmetric-level of comittment for both parties to do so with their current "front-runners" to the same extent as their citizenship and place of birth are relevant to their constitutional qualification for office. If there's one thing I learned about dealing with a folks who have nothing but accusations (this is directed at the perpetrators you gave as an example) it is that they are frequently worst-positioned to be examined on the exact same material they use as a sword sans shield. They have no shield because they lack a defense beyond just fighting with their target over the sword, when they are inevitably challenged and parried easily Edit: also, I'm more asking what is a pattern of behavior with similar facts indicative of or what clinical observations or inferences can be derived on a facial level? Edit: Julius Caesar had the falling sickness [epilepsy] Rome had a right to know that and take it into consideration as part of the populace's/Senate's delegation of all or most of State authority to this one impresdive and well-financed man Edit: most importantly, your prose is a little bit like a prism with light being refracted into a house of mirrors that are being infinitely recursively reflected on a concave trajectory