4 ms·
other commenters said it best but... chatgpt is available to all and its free (gpt3.5 anyway) so they can still argue its "open" in some way. Consider the alter
by penjelly 3y ago
other commenters said it best but... chatgpt is available to all and its free (gpt3.5 anyway) so they can still argue its "open" in some way. Consider the alternative where chatgpt is only for ceo's of megacorps or 3.5 is a paid plan. "Open" doesnt have to mean Open Source.
- SeanLuke 3y agohttps://web.archive.org/web/20151211215507/https://openai.com/blog/introducing-openai/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151211215507/https://openai.co... > As a non-profit, our aim is to build value for everyone rather than shareholders. Researchers will be strongly encouraged to publish their work, whether as papers, blog posts, or code, and our patents (if any) will be shared with the world. We'll freely collaborate with others across many institutions and expect to work with companies to research and deploy new technologies. It sure sounds like "open" meant Open Source to OpenAI.com.
- penjelly 3y agoyes it originally meant that, im saying it can now be argued that open means something different.