> Is he actually saying that alternatives to mass education are LESS ethically tolerable than compulsory graded schools? Yes, but he's hiding his point in poor

> Is he actually saying that alternatives to mass education are LESS ethically tolerable than compulsory graded schools? Yes, but he's hiding his point in poor phrasing. Compulsory, graded schools are one solution for disseminating mass education. Another solution for disseminating mass education are personalized learning platforms run by algorithms, or video courses that are taught by a teacher far away from the student. These futuristic, alternative solutions are "technically more feasible and ethically less tolerable".