3 ms·
The Wired writeup is one of the more misleading ones. You're right: what the paper finds is that Spanish Flu disproportionately killed the young cohorts... it j
by gwern 3y ago
The Wired writeup is one of the more misleading ones. You're right: what the paper finds is that Spanish Flu disproportionately killed the young cohorts... it just may have been within young cohorts disproportionately killing young people with subtle hidden frailties.
The real importance of this work is that it supports the interpretation that Spanish Flu was so deadly because young people missed a cycle of flu which would have immunized them to it as effectively as it had immunized (the surviving) elderly people, as opposed to some sort of intrinsic-youth-targeting factor unique to Spanish Flu.
- anonymouskimmer 3y ago> disproportionately killing young people with subtle hidden frailties. I'm really curious how many of the surviving elderly lacked those hidden frailties. That is, all else held equal, how many of the youth killed by the Spanish Flu would have died of other causes prior to becoming elderly?