> It's not really worth considering solutions that are going to maybe move the needle by 0.001%. Here's what the IPCC said [0]: > “The technical geological CO

> It's not really worth considering solutions that are going to maybe move the needle by 0.001%. Here's what the IPCC said [0]: > “The technical geological CO2 storage capacity is estimated to be on the order of 1000 gigatonnes of CO2, which is more than the CO2 storage requirements through 2100 to limit global warming to 1.5°C, although the regional availability of geological storage could be a limiting factor.” – SPM, p. 37 IEA said similar [1]. [0] https://www.catf.us/2022/04/what-does-latest-ipcc-report-say-about-carbon-capture/ https://www.catf.us/2022/04/what-does-latest-ipcc-report-say... [1] https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-world-has-vast-capacity-to-store-co2-net-zero-means-we-ll-need-it https://www.iea.org/commentaries/the-world-has-vast-capacity...