>You paid dues and got nothing but lower wages in return. What exactly did you want in return? The entire purpose is to be a collective with your co-workers. D

>You paid dues and got nothing but lower wages in return. What exactly did you want in return? The entire purpose is to be a collective with your co-workers. Do assertive, high performers need unionization? No, but that's not the point. >The union would also protect the jobs of under-performing employees which was just demoralizing If the "under-performers" are the people who don't work 50 hours a week and treat their job like a job, I'm all for them being "protected".