4 ms·
While I see what you're saying, the issue is that when you eyeball the graph, you think, "wow, it's 4x what it used to be".
by timsco 3y ago
While I see what you're saying, the issue is that when you eyeball the graph, you think, "wow, it's 4x what it used to be".
- laserbeam 3y agoHere's the thing... It might actually be 4x standard deviations higher, if not more. "Almost 2x absolute value" conveys less information here as the absolute minimum co2 value in the entire known history if the earth is non zero. And it is non zero. If I recall correctly it's closer to 80% of the value of recent preindustrial values (one should check this). Would be cool to see that value on the graph, also a median/average/max preindustrial value.
- ad404b8a372f2b9 3y agoIt does not convey less information, it conveys accurate information. At the scale of the x-axis, the viewer can see that it was always at 280 so no information is lost. No information is added by breaking the scale, if you want to convey standard deviations, add a secondary axis.