4 ms·
Your analysis is wrong. @livpost_br, @cosasdevida_13, @humseila, and @Steven_Mr9 are all bots. Early reg dates and retweeting of the content of others does not
by Apocryphon 3y ago
Your analysis is wrong. @livpost_br, @cosasdevida_13, @humseila, and @Steven_Mr9 are all bots. Early reg dates and retweeting of the content of others does not prove an account is not a bot. If you actually skim those accounts' replies more carefully, you will see the spamming of t-shirt links.
I concede that may not have been the best example. Did you actually read my comment in full? If you did, why did you pick one of the least convincing examples?
- MichaelZuo 3y ago> Your analysis is wrong. @livpost_br, @cosasdevida_13, @humseila, and @Steven_Mr9 are all bots. Can you link the proof or analysis behind this claim?
- Apocryphon 3y agohttps://twitter.com/livpost_br/with_replies https://twitter.com/livpost_br/with_replies Look at all of the non sequitur shirt tweets. https://twitter.com/cosasdevida_13/with_replies https://twitter.com/cosasdevida_13/with_replies Same here- same domains even (viralstyle.com and vrlstyl.com) https://twitter.com/humseila/with_replies https://twitter.com/humseila/with_replies Same domains, links to a domain that has been taken down due to TOS violations (gystoore.shop) https://twitter.com/Steven_Mr9/with_replies https://twitter.com/Steven_Mr9/with_replies Same spamming of links with vrlstyl.com domain, non-link tweets with fragmentary "bot speak." Just skim these feeds and you can get a general feel.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]