4 ms·
Solar and Wind are now much cheaper than nuclear has ever been. Germany has been adding 1GW of PV every month in 2023. That's one typical, large nuclear every
by esarbe 3y ago
Solar and Wind are now much cheaper than nuclear has ever been.
Germany has been adding 1GW of PV every month in 2023. That's one typical, large nuclear every month.
While I don't see nuclear energy as the folly I used to, I don't think it's the answer either.
- Dig1t 3y agoSolar and wind are great, we should continue to build that stuff. But also "have ever been" is the key part of your message. The cost of nuclear is based on technology from the 1960's. There have been no new reactor designs since then. New reactor designs could be built and operated at a fraction of the cost of old designs and would be many times safer as well.
- esarbe 3y agoDespite billions in subsidies, nuclear reactors have not become much cheaper to operate in the last 40 years. They have become safer and more efficient, sure. But not cheaper. Compare what PV has been able to achieve with way less subsidies and it becomes clear that nuclear - from a cost perspective - is a dead end.
- geod_of_ix 3y agoNuclear power is great, on paper, but in the real world humans have demonstrated over and over again that they cannot be trusted to a) Build it on time b) On budget c) Without corruption, skimping on materials, or taking shortcuts d) Regulate it properly e) Hold those involved accountable f) Design and implement a robust plan to store the resulting waste in a responsible manner Just look at the medical isotope shortages that have occurred. As a species we can't even see the need to have redundant sources of life saving materials that can only be produced in specialized reactors. What if something happens to them unexpectedly or they need maintenance? Shrug... is the answer we get.