2 ms·
I think the intent is less to have people actually pay for it, and more to use it as justification for their tracking on the users who won't pay for it.
by Macha 3y ago
I think the intent is less to have people actually pay for it, and more to use it as justification for their tracking on the users who won't pay for it.
- elondaits 3y agoYet, the GDPR states that private information should only be requested to provide a service that requires it and with “No strings attached”. My understanding (IANAL) was that the GDPR explicitly forbids asking for private information to pay for a service.
- Macha 3y agoSure, and Facebook's last two attempts were equally not particularly GDPR compliant. It's clear that "Questionably GDPR compliant" is not enough to stop Facebook attempting a scheme.