3 ms·

That is what the second link is. Most of those replies are fake, you can tell because there are bots working in call-and-answer pairs, with one stating their ad

• MichaelZuo 3y ago
  For the second link in your previous comment, only 4 accounts posted the same link 5 times total, and only one of the accounts looks suspicious enough to be a bot, the others have join dates of 2011, 2012, etc., and not too suspicious posting histories. Did you actually take a close look? If you did, why did you pick one of the least convincing examples?
  • Apocryphon 3y ago
    Your analysis is wrong. @livpost_br, @cosasdevida_13, @humseila, and @Steven_Mr9 are all bots. Early reg dates and retweeting of the content of others does not prove an account is not a bot. If you actually skim those accounts' replies more carefully, you will see the spamming of t-shirt links. I concede that may not have been the best example. Did you actually read my comment in full? If you did, why did you pick one of the least convincing examples?
    • MichaelZuo 3y ago
      > Your analysis is wrong. @livpost_br, @cosasdevida_13, @humseila, and @Steven_Mr9 are all bots. Can you link the proof or analysis behind this claim?
      • Apocryphon 3y ago
        https://twitter.com/livpost_br/with_replies https://twitter.com/livpost_br/with_replies Look at all of the non sequitur shirt tweets. https://twitter.com/cosasdevida_13/with_replies https://twitter.com/cosasdevida_13/with_replies Same here- same domains even (viralstyle.com and vrlstyl.com) https://twitter.com/humseila/with_replies https://twitter.com/humseila/with_replies Same domains, links to a domain that has been taken down due to TOS violations (gystoore.shop) https://twitter.com/Steven_Mr9/with_replies https://twitter.com/Steven_Mr9/with_replies Same spamming of links with vrlstyl.com domain, non-link tweets with fragmentary "bot speak." Just skim these feeds and you can get a general feel.
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]