> addressing point 10 would worsen point 50 I confess I am unable to come up with a line of reasoning where eliminating the amplification of bias, misinformati

> addressing point 10 would worsen point 50 I confess I am unable to come up with a line of reasoning where eliminating the amplification of bias, misinformation, and polarization has a negative effect on journalism's advertising revenue. The disruption to revenue, as I understand it is a direct outcome of Meta/Google/Twitter manipulating rewards and costs to drown out factual, thoughtful discourse in favor of whatever brings the most views to their platforms. Case in point: Twitter and the situation in Gaza as I write this.