The author of the thread forgot to mention the deck is from 2008. I was reading one of the tweets in his thread about funnels. Google has argued in court about

The author of the thread forgot to mention the deck is from 2008. I was reading one of the tweets in his thread about funnels. Google has argued in court about funnels is outdated, and he read this deck and concluded that Google is lying. We are gonna see a lot of such threads/articles/substacks/videos in the near term. Already saw what happened with the Wired article. It's a combination of engagement farming, creating content that gets clicks, and misunderstanding/misrepresenting what is there in the exhibits which would lead to a lot of rumors and false narratives. A question I thought of while reading the thread was: If this was so important and crystal clear as in the thread author wrote, why did DOJ not use it directly in the trial? (We would have known given there are bloggers who are covering the trial on a day to day basis)