3 ms·
Did you read the full article? The majority of it is defending why public financial oversight is good. Saying the article is "not good" while ignoring its cent
by DragonStrength 3y ago
Did you read the full article? The majority of it is defending why public financial oversight is good. Saying the article is "not good" while ignoring its central argument to make a tangential point is not convincing.
- robertlagrant 3y agoThe majority of it seemed to be very cherry-picked and caveated claims, with the claims being far more prominent than the caveats. If you want to avoid boom and bust cycles and the pursuit of growth at all costs, you probably want to avoid the public markets if you can, or at least for as long as possible.