3 ms·
Your claim that genetics, a science affecting all life, is not a credible science, doesn't mention humans at all, so I doubt you did. If you have to limit it t
by ImPostingOnHN 3y ago
Your claim that genetics, a science affecting all life, is not a credible science, doesn't mention humans at all, so I doubt you did.
If you have to limit it to "humans only", the claim falls apart anyways, because genetics isn't human-specific
- astrange 3y agoYour idea of an argument is to say that people don't know what their own posts mean?
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agoWho are you to tell us to not trust our eyes? When you're wrong at trivia, can you just claim "I meant [the right answer]"? If that's what you meant, perhaps you would have said it, but if you would had said it, it would have ruined your argument. Simply put, you haven't made a convincing case that genetics, a science affecting all life, not just humans, is "not a credible science", despite indeed involving experiments all the time. Below is where you can make that case.