4 ms·
Note that illich is against cities. In his mind, a more atomised world would emerge from such a ban, more localised and focused on communities in neighborhood,
by di4na 3y ago
Note that illich is against cities. In his mind, a more atomised world would emerge from such a ban, more localised and focused on communities in neighborhood, with less dependencies outside.
So the only thing using roads would be emergency. Food would need to be local too or transported slowly by speed of walk or bicycle.
Which means that we would all be taxed pretty high for something rarely used.
- paganel 3y ago> Food would need to be local too or transported slowly by speed of walk or bicycle. I'm sure he knew that, and I'm a genuine fan of Illich (with all his pluses and minuses), but what he proposes will certainly lead to future famines.
- palata 3y agoWell big cities are a problem we need to address. They absolutely depend on fossil fuel for trucks to bring food into them.