4 ms·
If compatibility is a priority and bandwidth isn't an issue, MJPEG is still the way to go and is by far the most common encoding I see in security cameras.
by franga2000 3y ago
If compatibility is a priority and bandwidth isn't an issue, MJPEG is still the way to go and is by far the most common encoding I see in security cameras.
- _flux 3y agoOn the other hand you could get cool stuff from the video encoding hardware, such as access to motion vectors on the cheap: https://github.com/osmaa/pinymotion https://github.com/osmaa/pinymotion I wonder though if the OpenGL ES3.1 compute could be used for this purpose on it.
- franga2000 3y agoOh wow, this is such a great hack!
- ilyt 3y ago[dead]
- garaetjjte 3y agoI think nobody used MJPEG in last 15 years.
- lxgr 3y agoWell, GP just shared that it's still widely used within security cameras? It's also the only compressed format supported by many popular webcams, e.g. Logitech's C900 series ever since they removed H.264. Digital cinema projectors apparently also use it (well, the JPEG2000 variant) exclusively since MPEG-2 was deprecated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package