4 ms·
And yet, the clinical standard has been to use the "with" terminology for a long time now. For exactly the general reason that you present, just with your gramm
by mrangle 3y ago
And yet, the clinical standard has been to use the "with" terminology for a long time now. For exactly the general reason that you present, just with your grammatical paradigm inverted.
The fact is that anyone can copy and paste "offense" complaints and insert any grammar that they want into ad-lib spaces.
What the ASD community could use less of is individuals utilizing it as their political arena.
- nyanmatt 3y ago> And yet, the clinical standard has been to use the "with" terminology for a long time now. For exactly the general reason that you present, just with your grammatical paradigm inverted. If that's the clinical standard, why didn't the cited paper use it that way? From the research paper: > autistic individuals > autistic employees > autistic participants The peer reviewed research paper uses this standard. Only using "with" in reference to diagnoses. It is "Science Daily", a news site, who skirts the standard by changing the paper's wording.