3 ms·
Sounded totally credible. For me it evoked the situation of GM plants that show up on plots of land of anti-GM farmers, rendering their crops commercially void
by ArnoVW 3y ago
Sounded totally credible. For me it evoked the situation of GM plants that show up on plots of land of anti-GM farmers, rendering their crops commercially void (and theoretically infringing on the GM licence).
My thought was more: would it not be possible to counter-sue and get damages from them in court. For after all, they "polluted" your lab / plot with something that you never asked for, and that is now causing damages / lost earnings.
- cyberax 3y ago> Sounded totally credible. For me it evoked the situation of GM plants that show up on plots of land of anti-GM farmers, rendering their crops commercially void (and theoretically infringing on the GM licence). Except this almost never happens. But if it does, Monsanto (now Bayer) will reimburse you the cost of contaminated crops.