> But shouldn’t your moral stances be determined when you are clear-eyed, and are thinking about society as a whole rather than your personal situation? Have y

> But shouldn’t your moral stances be determined when you are clear-eyed, and are thinking about society as a whole rather than your personal situation? Have you thought that, being clear-eyed, you may not yet have the experience of being terminally ill and in pain that cannot be medicated away? The only prospect for life being permanently chained to a bed awaiting your death? How easy it is to serve these strong opinions when you are healthy. > Your argument is couched in the same form as the argument: If you have no experience of something you need a much stronger argument to prove you are not only correct, but correct to the point it overrides somebody elses freedom.