2 ms·
Corporations are strongly pushing natalism which seems to have found a home in contrarian conservative politics. The formulae is simple, more consumers and thus
by cjbgkagh 3y ago
Corporations are strongly pushing natalism which seems to have found a home in contrarian conservative politics. The formulae is simple, more consumers and thus better prices for goods which corporations make and the assets they own. There are more workers competing for the same jobs so their input costs are cheaper. The actual costs associated with large populations are externalized. Keeping a ponzi economic system going is simply a bonus. I'm a foot-voting libertarian (anti-corporatist) not a commie but this shit stinks.
We're not going to get greater innovation out of more people if those people have to spend their lives toiling to survive while eating increasingly unhealthy food. I don't see why we couldn't have graceful degradation of the population. The idea that we'll need many people to look after us as we get old is predicated on people living rather unhealthy lifestyles. We would be far better off looking after our health and being good stewards of the environment.
- 7thaccount 3y agoYep it is a ponzi scheme that resists some form of equilibrium IMO. The downside to what's happening is reduced growth in plenty of things or at least glacially slow growth. I hate rampant consumerism, but it's hard to imagine the growth in computing power without it. Imagine if we had all just stopped with the Commodore 64 lol and called it good enough. The same goes for practically everything. The upside is that my labor becomes more and more valuable and corporate America becomes less all encompassing. But yeah. I wonder what will happen if this trend persists? Will deflation happen? What if people go back to just having different clothes based on the seasons and not on a 52-week fashion cycle like many women? Is that so bad?