You're picking and choosing facts to verify your confirmation bias and literally stating that. > As for Al-Ahli bombing, I don't trust IDF on that one. The ID

You're picking and choosing facts to verify your confirmation bias and literally stating that. > As for Al-Ahli bombing, I don't trust IDF on that one. The IDF provided multiple different sources one of which were obtained by al-jazeera. It included recorded calls, missile and bombing information. Pictures from the ground that showed the impact. This was then reviewed by both foreign press (not just NYT, also CNN and other sources) and by the USAs defense department. All concluded that Israel told the truth. Israeli bombs are accurate. Israel would have no motivation to bomb a hospital and doesn't bomb a hospital where it KNOWS the Hamas is headquartered. The fact that you explicitly still choose not to believe the facts shows that you made that deep choice. I suggest you re-evaluate that. Yes. Israeli settlements are terrible. Israel did do a lot of bad things in the past too. But there are no settlements in Gaza. In this particular point in time Israel isn't perfect, but you shouldn't let past biases dictate the current situation. > As for my argument around Gaza destruction, that's refering to the final state (not the current one). So besides judging Israel in general, you also judge it for crimes it will commit in the future? Are you reading what you're saying??? Not a single word included anything against how terrible the Hamas really is. How it places its own people in danger, how it treats its own civilians in times of "peace". Nothing? Israel did and probably will do bad things. Blaming it for stuff it didn't do damages the cause of protecting the Palestinian people. Facts matter, it's a fact that the Hamas is a racist, murderous organization. The IDF has its faults, but it is ultimately accountable for its actions and usually does provide well documented information that complies with international law.