3 ms·
> If not, why should a PM bother about irrelevant details? Because engineering failed to consider these details. Now I'm the one that has to point out how ama
by snapetom 3y ago
> If not, why should a PM bother about irrelevant details?
Because engineering failed to consider these details. Now I'm the one that has to point out how amateur we look when in some areas we don't require TLS and others we're so strict, we only have 1.3. Engineers (management or rank and file) who can't understand why this is a problem is exactly the reason you need technical PMs.
- rewmie 3y ago> Because engineering failed to consider these details. I don't think you got the point. The point is that no one cares, or think it's important enough and much less critical to justify wasting time with it. Product Managers are there to create value, and spending time on things no one notices is not how you create value.