Know the rules and then break them. If you are criticising a physicist, you should be competent enough to know their jargon and conclusively point out gaps in t

Know the rules and then break them. If you are criticising a physicist, you should be competent enough to know their jargon and conclusively point out gaps in their knowledge. E.g. as Sabine is doing with lost in math. Just stating scientist could be wrong isn't helpful.