4 ms·
And to that I say, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Christianity has had 2000 years to produce extraordinary evidence. What's the hold up?
by coupdejarnac 3y ago
And to that I say, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Christianity has had 2000 years to produce extraordinary evidence. What's the hold up?
- AnimalMuppet 3y agoAn empty grave is, in fact, "extraordinary evidence".
- freedomben 3y agoYou mean, somebody wrote down "eye witness" accounts many decades after the event occurred (that contradict each other in important ways. Like, which day was Jesus crucified? The day after Passover was eaten (Synoptic gospels) or the day before it was eaten? (John)), that have absolutely no way to be verified. I don't see how that is "extraordinary evidence." Some ancients also claimed to see various pagan Gods, but I'm guessing you don't consider that to be "evidence."