3 ms·

Agree. Many are ignoring the fact that these ads aren't all traditional advertising. Particularly appauling in my view is the propaganda: https://www.smh.com.a

Agree. Many are ignoring the fact that these ads aren't all traditional advertising. Particularly appauling in my view is the propaganda: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/clive-palmer-spends-100-times-more-than-major-parties-on-advertising-20220218-p59xq4.html https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/clive-palmer-spends-... We saw similar things with The Voice referendum recently. When someone has paid to manipulate society en masse, and there are no more targeted controls to stop the content being forced on you available, why is anyone surprised people choose to filter that?

BLKNSLVR 3y ago
... and Australia has (had maybe?) pretty good rules around television advertising. I mean, at least it's a good way up the logarithmic scale from internet advertising standards anyway. P.S. I use Clive Palmer's advertising as a useful data point for what not to support, so it's not a total waste.