2 ms·
The article did not advocate for disrespecting liberty. It actually very hilariously directly talked about exactly your post: “Gut feelings” and “people exper
by wredue 3y ago
The article did not advocate for disrespecting liberty.
It actually very hilariously directly talked about exactly your post:
“Gut feelings” and “people experiencing things” are not independently verifiable facts. In fact, every time religious experiences are tested, they are not repeatable or verifiable.
- ukj 3y agoRepeatability and verifiability aren’t the be-all/end-all criteria for knowledge/truth. Thus is over-selling science as the only avenue to truth/knowledge. Where does it leave formal/mathematical/theoretical knowledge? Where does this leave historical and political facts? Moral truths? Science is at best instrumentalism.