3 ms·
We could apply LLMs to act as an interface with the angry crowd, rephrasing angry comments into constructive criticism and summarizing needs. In turn LLMs could
by gchamonlive 3y ago
We could apply LLMs to act as an interface with the angry crowd, rephrasing angry comments into constructive criticism and summarizing needs. In turn LLMs could be applied to synthesise development progress and answer the angry crowd. Everyone would be happy.
- djbusby 3y agoOr, use an LLM to detect angry comments and delete them before any humans have to deal with the BS
- gchamonlive 3y agoYou don't need llm for that I think. But sure, if you want people to just leave you. It is a pain but a part of scaling is dealing with a crowd. And I would prefer LLMs to hallucinate a nice constructive criticism than to delete comments by mistake.
- djbusby 3y agoI'm pretty familiar with scale and open source. Entitled jerks can fuck off. They take away from your passion and those helpful & respectful users. I draw a hard line there - not letting haters get in the way of love.
- PH95VuimJjqBqy 3y agoor use LLM's to ruby my feet before bed since apparently LLM's can, and should, be applied to everything. I can't wait for the day an LLM can wipe my ass for me.
- Tao3300 3y agoNo. Because then angry people are rewarded for being angry, and that's not happy.
- gchamonlive 3y agoThey are not angry because they are rewarded for being angry. And an answer is far for being a reward. A negative answer is still an answer.