4 ms·
You can only increase distance so much before something breaks. I think it's weird that you have such a strong opinion about this. Clearly you care about distan
by brigadier132 3y ago
You can only increase distance so much before something breaks. I think it's weird that you have such a strong opinion about this. Clearly you care about distance more but speed is another performance measure that is just as important.
Also if we are purely talking about health, doing 26 mile runs regularly is not healthy.
- nlh 3y agoI don't know that I have a strong opinion on this. I'm just curious why such a large majority of people are so focused on speed. I don't generally care about increasing distance either -- I'm just focused on general health and the enjoyment of the experience more than how fast I do the thing. A long bike ride with friends at a fast-enough-to-get-exercise pace is delightful. I never care about how long it takes us to do it.
- anthomtb 3y ago> general health > enjoyment of the experience These are subjective measurements. You decide, maybe subconsciously, whether you are feeling healthy or have enjoyed your experience. Speed and distance are objective. An 8 minute mile is faster than a 9 minute mile. 30 miles is farther than 20 (lets keep elevation constant). When it comes to sports, some of us are driven by those objective measurements. Sometime to beat the "other guy", sometimes just to beat ourselves. I don't know that I can fully explain that drive to someone that lacks it. Have you ever felt driven to perform your best by some objective measurement in a non-sporting aspect of your life? School, work, video games?