Isn't this ancient? I saw a logo like this many, many years ago, and the ipv6 support was still really really shitty (eg. firewall for ipv4 being full-featured

Isn't this ancient? I saw a logo like this many, many years ago, and the ipv6 support was still really really shitty (eg. firewall for ipv4 being full-featured while one checkmark existed for ipv6 - pass through everythong or nothing). EU has some financing rules, where in many cases, you cannot buy any equipment with public money if it doesn't support IPv6, and RIPE-554 (now 722 - https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-772 https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-772 ) was written just to avoid the "ipv6 ready" devices... so many tenders had a ripe 554/722 requirement written in back then (now it doesn't really matter, since most of equipment adequately supports ipv6, at least the stuff from "big vendors". edit: yeah, right from the ripe772 : "While the Logo certification was devised around 20 years ago..."