4 ms·
I'm not suggesting that the observer has a problem or condition. I'm saying that reality isn't just physical, and that we make a mistake when we expect everythi
by b800h 3y ago
I'm not suggesting that the observer has a problem or condition. I'm saying that reality isn't just physical, and that we make a mistake when we expect everything to always be physically testable, even if to the observer it might seem at times to involve physical effects.
- etrautmann 3y agoIt’s not fundamentally untestable or unobservable though at the level of brain activity, which we could in theory measure with the right technology. It’s still physical unless you’re a proponent of dualism, which doesn’t make a lot of sense given current neuroscience or philosophy.
- b800h 3y agoThat's not quite what I'm getting at. Hallucinations are meaningful if you consider the narrative of life to be more important than the mechanism in which it plays out. Further to that, the act of testing or observation isn't itself without its effects.