3 ms·
You're completely missing everything outside the ontological category of "things that can be broken apart into stuff that I can identify with a microscope". Re
by b800h 3y ago
You're completely missing everything outside the ontological category of "things that can be broken apart into stuff that I can identify with a microscope".
Realistically this conversation is a science vs. religion argument that will end up in a stalemate somewhere around Tarski's Undefinability Theorem.
We disagree on the nature of the ground of being.