3 ms·
> If you take that model seriously, Usain Bolt could have been anybody in the entire history of mankind. No model is perfect, but I don’t have the slightest cl
by codeflo 3y ago
> If you take that model seriously, Usain Bolt could have been anybody in the entire history of mankind.
No model is perfect, but I don’t have the slightest clue why you think that would follow.
- tgv 3y agoBecause it fits by multiplying random variables. It cannot explain why records are improving, i.e. why Usain Bolt didn't live 100 years ago.
- suavesito 3y agoIt can explain it. Better training and better equipment are (at least) two variables that improve people timings. Maybe a century ago there was an Usain Bolt, just didn't had neither the proper training, nor equipment, and those low factors avoided better timings.
- iLoveOncall 3y agoAnd nutrition of course.
- tgv 3y agoExcept the model was fitted on people from the same period in the same region. Also, Ethiopian runners would be a counterargument. It's just reading way too much in a model that probably was there before the data. Seeing how everybody defends it as "learning", the example was sought to be described by the model.