3 ms·
You appear to be leaping to the wrong conclusion. The problem is Canonical charging money for security updates. CentOS, Alma, Rocky, Fedora, Debian, openSUSE, A
by 1letterunixname 3y ago
You appear to be leaping to the wrong conclusion. The problem is Canonical charging money for security updates. CentOS, Alma, Rocky, Fedora, Debian, openSUSE, Arch, and 300+ other Linux distros don't charge money for security updates either. The moral of the story is "Don't use enshitifying corporate Linux distros run by crazy people."
- r4indeer 3y agoThis still has nothing to do with the ImageMagick developers, which the original comment implies: "Compare [sic] to codesign, vulnerability management is more concerning." You are free to criticize Canonical for their business model, but that seems off-topic to me right now.
- tremon 3y agoThe problem of Canonical charging money for security updates is off-topic when we're discussing ImageMagick's code-signing troubles on Windows.
- 1letterunixname 3y agoThat's your opinion, and I don't care for your attempts to shut people down. Kindly control people on the rest of the internet. :peace: