I think your reply was intended to be facetious, but I take it to be not only true, but to highlight that what Anti-ChatGPT actually intends to do is not to fil

I think your reply was intended to be facetious, but I take it to be not only true, but to highlight that what Anti-ChatGPT actually intends to do is not to filter out all bias (which would leave nothing, as you observe), but rather only to filter out political bias that "deserves to be filtered out". And as soon as we realise that, we realise that the notion of "deserves" depends almost completely on a person's own political opinions. So the big question is: Whose political opinions will determine what Anti-ChatGPT calls "bias"? The moment we even consider that this question is necessary to ask, we realise that the underlying political nature of Anti-ChatGPT can't be escaped.