2 ms·
Well, other FCC users are commercial users of the airwaves. Wouldn’t it make sense that their fees would cover the costs of “ongoing support” of the citizenry’s
by Crunchified 3y ago
Well, other FCC users are commercial users of the airwaves. Wouldn’t it make sense that their fees would cover the costs of “ongoing support” of the citizenry’s non-commercial use of radio spectrum? It’s not like they have to build roads or buildings to make this happen - it’s just some rulemaking and a database.
If you’re not aware, hams have for many years received paltry (at best) support from the FCC in terms of any enforcement.
- hiatus 3y ago> If you’re not aware, hams have for many years received paltry (at best) support from the FCC in terms of any enforcement. Could you expand on what you mean here? What enforcement is lacking?