5 ms·
Gave it a try some time ago and it was at Bing's level in terms of the search quality. Even simple queries for something as trivial like (Windows) API function
by huhtenberg 3y ago
Gave it a try some time ago and it was at Bing's level in terms of the search quality. Even simple queries for something as trivial like (Windows) API function names came back with a lot of noise and junk as a top result. Less trivial stuff was worse. I love the idea behind it, but it's not a real alternative for Google, not yet.
- nvarsj 3y agoBeen using Kagi now for a couple months and overall find it better than G. G also returned lots of rubbish depending on the query. At least in Kagi I can blacklist obvious SEO spam sites and never see them again.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- elektor 3y agoThat's the beauty of Kagi, you can hide and downrank the noise and junk websites so that you only get the high-quality domains you're looking for.
- dharmab 3y agoDid you use the custom ranking feature? Pin the official docs, raise good sources, lower or block bad ones.
- huhtenberg 3y agoWell, no. I expected the search engine to give relevant results right off the bat.