3 ms·
It's taking advantage of another developer's $99 payment. I just took a look at one of these apps and the in-app purchase to remove ads is $1.99. I think if I d
by js2 3y ago
It's taking advantage of another developer's $99 payment. I just took a look at one of these apps and the in-app purchase to remove ads is $1.99. I think if I did this I'd throw that developer the 2 bucks.
Sort of like when you bum a ride from someone, even though it's not costing them anything, it's good form to offer to split the cost of gasoline.
- circuit10 3y agoIt would be nice to do that but I don’t think this is some horribly immoral thing either
- saagarjha 3y agoLook I’ll generate and give you a certificate for free if you want one.
- js2 3y agoI'd pay Apple $99 before I asked another developer to do that for me, probably putting their agreement with Apple at risk. Taking a principled stance against Apple is fine. I'm totally onboard with that. I only think it's uncool to take that stance and then use another developer's cert without their permission. Even though it's unlikely, it can only harm that other developer. Based on all the downvotes HN seems to disagree, but I don't see what's so unreasonable about my position.