3 ms·
How is that a fair point? First, how do you define "untrue", and second "knows", in any meaningful sense? A country like China is in the position to define what
by auggierose 3y ago
How is that a fair point? First, how do you define "untrue", and second "knows", in any meaningful sense? A country like China is in the position to define what "untrue" is, and of course, if it is untrue, then it is not possible that you have a different opinion, so you know by default that it is untrue.
So this is just pure and simple censoring. And certainly against free speech.
- mdp2021 3y agoYou are reading it differently from a direct reading: it just means "lying" through an operational definition. "Prime minister (etc.), you called X "Y" even though it seems Y is not the case. Did you knowingly disseminate what you know was not true?" I am pointing to the fact that you can witness the practice of lying quite frequently from quite high chairs. I would not mind those crimes (as always justified under the idea of a "greater good", just like this law) to be assessed.