3 ms·
Sounds very silly. If an author wanted a specific type, they could just use that type, — – et al are type-able with basic keyboard setting-up. from old to new:
by its-summertime 3y ago
Sounds very silly. If an author wanted a specific type, they could just use that type, — – et al are type-able with basic keyboard setting-up.
from old to new:
2010 → 2010
002D → 2010
\002D → 002D
(unless source documents MUST be ASCII, which I'm guessing isn't the case)
And anything that makes a jaunt through a pre-parser (e.g. converting comments eventually to man pages) is going to have a lot of fun with `\\-\\-foo \\-\\-bar`