will take advantage of your knowledge for a question and also a comment to your post. No writer should be trusted blindly but i don’t thjnk you meant that lite

will take advantage of your knowledge for a question and also a comment to your post. No writer should be trusted blindly but i don’t thjnk you meant that literally ;) just for others to see. all information should have some verification even from trusted sources. on the author though, can you share a bit about the subject and the author’s participation in android dev? i’ve never touched android anything dev wise so i’m not even sure if the topic being discussed is a new and unexplored territory, explored but still evolving, or if it’s something the community has settled on with plenty of data to back their conclusion. similarly im not sure if the author is really skilled enough to have controversial opinions or if it’s more they’re alright but excitable. how would you position the two points just from your point of view? i get the impression the author of the article is controversial and also opinionated i. “unusual” ways — for me, such persons are interesting to hear from even if a lot of their ideas are non-sense or fanciful. “out-there” ideas often are just out there for no reason, but sometimes there’s gold in such ideas, or good thoughts and starting points for actual golden ones. wiuod you personally at least listen to this author just in case there’s some gold or are they very much so just in their own world?