4 ms·

Again. I don't have that but you don't have the counter evidence that it didn't exist. Show me evidence of any bombing from any western country in any campaign

Again. I don't have that but you don't have the counter evidence that it didn't exist. Show me evidence of any bombing from any western country in any campaign ever... I get that Israel should be held to a higher standard than the Hamas. But your specific attitude makes no sense. Intelligence information is internal, wartime bombings target decisions are privileged information.

bluish29 3y ago
> I don't have that but you don't have the counter evidence that it didn't exist This is not the problem, people who claim something have to provide the evidence if asked, you don't respond to them by re-directing the question and ask them for counter-proof. At least in the normal world. I don't know about you. > I get that Israel should be held to a higher standard than the Hamas Providing evidence to claims is now a higher standard? man you live in a wild world. > But your specific attitude makes no sense. Intelligence information is internal, wartime bombings target decisions are privileged information So they can attack and kill anyone and claim they were military targets, and when asked for evidence then they will not provide because it is internal? Do you know what claims without evidence can be considered, yes propaganda like the one you tried to spread in this comment which is our discussion context.
- invalidname 3y ago
  > This is not the problem, people who claim something have to provide the evidence if asked No we don't. However, I did provide evidence which you choose to ignore. You also claim that the army would bomb a place for no real reason which just doesn't make sense. Especially for the first target in a campaign. It's you who should provide evidence, not me. > > But your specific attitude makes no sense. Intelligence information is internal, wartime bombings target decisions are privileged information > > So they can attack and kill anyone and claim they were military targets, and when asked for evidence then they will not provide because it is internal? Nonsense. This is an attack on a building. Bombing is a coarse instrument and the IDF holds regular briefings where they provide evidence. All the papers spent a day claiming Israel bombed a hospital killing 500 people. Total lie and the Hamas knew it when they came out with it. The IDF gathers and provides evidence for relevant situations (e.g. the Hospital bombing). It is accountable unlike the Hamas which is not.
  - bluish29 3y ago
    > No we don't Thank you, that was the answer that you should just say from the beginning.
- lobocinza 3y ago
  > Providing evidence to claims is now a higher standard? man you live in a wild world. Yep, that's the world we live in. Politicians, corporations, journalists frequently don't. Even "scientists" from time to time fake data & results. Military at least have a valid reason for not publicizing intel, specially in times of war.

bluish29 3y ago

> I don't have that but you don't have the counter evidence that it didn't exist This is not the problem, people who claim something have to provide the evidence if asked, you don't respond to them by re-directing the question and ask them for counter-proof. At least in the normal world. I don't know about you. > I get that Israel should be held to a higher standard than the Hamas Providing evidence to claims is now a higher standard? man you live in a wild world. > But your specific attitude makes no sense. Intelligence information is internal, wartime bombings target decisions are privileged information So they can attack and kill anyone and claim they were military targets, and when asked for evidence then they will not provide because it is internal? Do you know what claims without evidence can be considered, yes propaganda like the one you tried to spread in this comment which is our discussion context.

invalidname 3y ago
> This is not the problem, people who claim something have to provide the evidence if asked No we don't. However, I did provide evidence which you choose to ignore. You also claim that the army would bomb a place for no real reason which just doesn't make sense. Especially for the first target in a campaign. It's you who should provide evidence, not me. > > But your specific attitude makes no sense. Intelligence information is internal, wartime bombings target decisions are privileged information > > So they can attack and kill anyone and claim they were military targets, and when asked for evidence then they will not provide because it is internal? Nonsense. This is an attack on a building. Bombing is a coarse instrument and the IDF holds regular briefings where they provide evidence. All the papers spent a day claiming Israel bombed a hospital killing 500 people. Total lie and the Hamas knew it when they came out with it. The IDF gathers and provides evidence for relevant situations (e.g. the Hospital bombing). It is accountable unlike the Hamas which is not.
- bluish29 3y ago
  > No we don't Thank you, that was the answer that you should just say from the beginning.
lobocinza 3y ago
> Providing evidence to claims is now a higher standard? man you live in a wild world. Yep, that's the world we live in. Politicians, corporations, journalists frequently don't. Even "scientists" from time to time fake data & results. Military at least have a valid reason for not publicizing intel, specially in times of war.